On 13.03.2010 19:30, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:06:46AM -0500,
Marshall Eubanks<tme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
a message of 61 lines which said:
This follows an ISO standard, ISO 8601,
Sections 5.5 of RFC 3339 explain very well why you should not use ISO
8601 but its subset of RFC 3339.
On the other hand, RFC 3339 refers to an outdated version of ISO 8601,
and probably should be updated.
and also happens to sort properly (in time order).
ISO 8601 does not really have this property, see section 5.1 of RFC
3339.
Nor does RFC 3339's format (as it allows different notations for the
timezone offset).
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf