>>>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:52:25 -0500, Robert Story <Robert.Story@xxxxxxxxxx> said: RS> I think that the inconsistent use of 'Client' and 'Server' in the RS> object names is confusing. Both snmpTlstmSessionOpens and RS> snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors are client-side only objects, and RS> snmpTlstmSessionAccepts is a server-side only object. Putting RS> Client/Server back in the object names will make it much easier to RS> understand the output of a snmpwalk without having to refer to the RS> description clause in the MIB. This naming scheme was the result of a previous discussion (that I lost!) and the decision at the time was that the words "client" and "server" weren't needed in objects that were already only useful for that type of entity. IE: "ServerAccepts" is redundant since only a server can accept new connections. Because this is already a closed issue I don't see a need to revisit the discussion. -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf