On 2010-02-24, at 15:50, Tony Finch wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Shane Kerr wrote: >> >> DNSSEC declares out of scope: >> * the channel where DS records get added to the parent > > Is that actually out of scope or just not specified yet? The whole channel from end-user (registrant) to registry cannot usefully be specified in any general way because there is no consistent way of interacting with a registrar (in the name of open competition) and no consistent registry-registrar-registrant structure across all TLDs (for reasons that surely would require more than one parenthetical phrase to describe adequately). The component that concerns communication between a registry and a registrar does have one solution that has been standardised in the IETF, however, which is being implemented at some TLDs, I hear. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4310.txt Joe _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf