Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> At 8:50 PM +0000 2/24/10, Tony Finch wrote:
> >On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Shane Kerr wrote:
> >>
> >> DNSSEC declares out of scope:
> >>       * the channel where DS records get added to the parent
> >
> >Is that actually out of scope or just not specified yet?
>
> What part of DNSCurve did you think was "specified" yet?

Sorry, I didn't mean that post to be about DNScurve. It seems to me that
there's still work to do on managing secure DNSSEC delegations, so I was
surprised to see it listed as "out of scope". I was thinking more of
updating DS records on key rollovers rather than initial setup of a
delegation, though.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]