Re: Securing DNS Re: IAB statement on the RPKI.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> One mechanism that was unfortunately pushed asside as a result of the
> fixation on end to end DNSSEC would be to for the resolver to use
> DNSSEC (and other methods) to authenticate the data it receives and to
> use some modification of TSIG to authenticate the communication
> between client and resolver.

I don't think that has been pushed aside. There's not much interest in it
at the moment because the focus is on authoritative-to-recursive DNSSEC.
Maybe attention will turn to recursive-to-stub security once there is more
assurance that the recursive server's answers are authentic.

> It would not take a great deal of effort to graft a Kerberos like scheme
> on to effect key exchange.

Or use SIG(0).

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]