Re: draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Edward Lewis wrote:
At 10:57 -0500 2/12/10, Stephen Kent wrote:

If we look at what the CP developed in the SIDR WG for the RPKI says, the
answer is the IESG (going forward, after an initial set of algs are adopted based on the SIDR WG process). In the IPSEC, TLS, and SMIME contexts, the WGs themselves have made the decisions, which the IESG then approves by virtue of
the usual standards track RFC approval process. I do not believe that the
criteria have been documented uniformly across these WGs.

What is "CP?"

Certificate Policy: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sidr-cp-08.txt

spt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]