SM <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If it can cause operational problems, then the present text should be > reworded. I'll reuse text provided by Russ: > DNS SRV RRs, like all DNS RRs, have a time-to-live (TTL), after which > the SRV record information is no longer valid [RFC1034]. DNS RRs SHOULD > be discarded after their TTL, and the DNS query repeated. This applies > to DNS SRV RRs for AFS as to any other DNS RR. Any information derived > from the DNS SRV RRs, such as preference ranks, MUST be discarded when > the DNS SRV RR is expired. > I moved the RFC 1034 reference to the first sentence in that paragraph. I > removed the "As specified in" to avoid any inference that the "should" in > RFC 1034 has been elevated to a "SHOULD". This looks great. Thank you! Adopted for the next version of the I-D. -- Russ Allbery (rra@xxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf