Re: xml2rfc 1.34 on Ubuntu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/04/2010 08:18 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
On Feb 4, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
2544 different packages installed in my main computer.

!!!

It happens. So you want xterm. That's one package, but it depends on a few for the shared libraries and a whole lot for fonts. Xterm can display dozens of alphabets, and formerly odd glyps like ☑ → … ≠ are actually used these days, even in plain English text, so installing a wide selection of fonts by default makes sense. So you want an audio player. It can play a dozen audio formats, most of which involve a separate package called libfoo or blahplayer. It adds up.

Anyway, I don't need a new version until I need a new version,
and that's when I know I need a new version and I download it.
I don't download it if I don't need a new version. What I'm
reading here is that people are installing and maintaining
stuff they don't need, which I suppose explains the 2544
packages. I'd certainly never deny people the ability to
easily maintain unused and unnecessary software and we're
headed *way* off-topic, but I was just struck by how odd it
seemed that somebody who needed the new release of xml2rfc
would be frustrated by it not being in the absolutely,
completely, 100% farkakte ports system.

I think you might change your opinion after using a package manager that's approximately 0% verkackt for a while. IMO ubuntu's is the best there is at the moment.

(Nice word btw, first time I've seen that in English.)

Arnt
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]