RE: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation (Transport LayerSecurity (TLS) Renegotiation Indication Extension) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paragraph 3 of section 4 says:

   Because this cipher suite is equivalent to an empty
   "renegotiation_info" extension, only renegotiation_info" may be used
   rehandshakes.

Leaving aside the incorrect punctuation, this doesn't make any sense to me.


In section 5, suggest replacing all occurrences of the word "draft" with the
word "specification".


In section 6.2, s/NOT allow clients who do not offer the
"renegotiation_info" extension/NOT allow clients which do not offer the
"renegotiation_info" extension/.





_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]