Re: IPv6 standard?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:05:02AM +0200, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
> 
> The matter came up in an IPv6 discussion ISOC Chapters teleconference call 
> last night. We reached a burning question which nobody could answer 
> factually:
> 
> Is a dual stack IPv4-IPv6 likely to be more unstable than pure IPv4 or pure 
> IPv6?
> 
> 
> -- 
> Olivier MJ Cr?pin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html 
> 

	Empirical evidence (as documented in the network operational
	lists over the past 10 years) indicates that dual stack is 
	clearly more unstable.

	about 3 years ago, I moved my entire dual-stack network to
	single stack (v6) - with two exceptions... the IVI gateway
	and the DNS/DHCP server.


--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]