Re: [IAB] Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/22/09 9:42 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:

> Once again, I see nothing in the offending language that prohibits us 
> from either discussing or using encryption in any way we see fit. If 
> you want to host a BOF on how to circumvent certain rules and you want 
> to invite people off the street to attend, then, yeah, maybe someone
> might take you aside and suggest that isn's such a good idea, but I
> would argue that such a BOF is quite outside the normal business of
> the IETF.

Thank you for the clarifications.

> Sigh, I will get a high Narten score this week....

It's worse if you digitally sign your messages...

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkq5meMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vz3CgCdHg2Bg8EaQbYvjXJDB3SMBTvN
Ac4AnArRKDUrldCeOwB1AIdhQatXf2B7
=EPWE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]