-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/22/09 9:42 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote: > Once again, I see nothing in the offending language that prohibits us > from either discussing or using encryption in any way we see fit. If > you want to host a BOF on how to circumvent certain rules and you want > to invite people off the street to attend, then, yeah, maybe someone > might take you aside and suggest that isn's such a good idea, but I > would argue that such a BOF is quite outside the normal business of > the IETF. Thank you for the clarifications. > Sigh, I will get a high Narten score this week.... It's worse if you digitally sign your messages... Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkq5meMACgkQNL8k5A2w/vz3CgCdHg2Bg8EaQbYvjXJDB3SMBTvN Ac4AnArRKDUrldCeOwB1AIdhQatXf2B7 =EPWE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf