--On Monday, September 21, 2009 11:56 +0300 Jari Arkko
<jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Brian,
>
>> I think my comment still applies - it should be the IESG that
>> appeals against the Editor's final decision, not the other
>> way round.
>>
>
> Ok. I have no problem placing the burden on initiating the
> formal dispute resolution from the IESG side instead. For
> instance, if the current text says
>
> "If dialogue fails to resolve IRSG or RFC Editor concerns with
> the content of a particular IESG note, then they can take the
> matter to the IAB for a final ruling."
>
> to
>
> "If dialogue fails to resolve IRSG or RFC Editor concerns with
> the content of a particular IESG note, the IESG can take the
> matter to the IAB for a final ruling."
>
> Would this help resolve your concerns?
It would certainly help resolve some of mine.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf