Hi, I also fully agree with Steve. I wrote similar thoughts in the survey. Regards, Wassim H. ________________________________________ From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Simon Perreault [simon.perreault@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 21:18 To: Steve Crocker Cc: IAOC IAOC; ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting of the IETF On Saturday 19 September 2009 15:55:55 Steve Crocker wrote: > The choice is between engaging and not engaging. Engaging is better. > Not engaging isn't constructive. Thank you. I wanted to say this, but could not find the right words. I fully agree with Steve Crocker. In the long run, exposure to and participation in the IETF might even prove beneficial to the Chinese. Thanks, Simon -- DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca vCard 4.0 --> http://www.vcarddav.org _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf