Re: IPv6 standard?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eliot Lear writes:
Historic is appropriate when we want to make a statement about the appropriateness of the technology. However, we probably enter a huge bureaucratic entanglement of what happens to all of the docs that normatively reference 791, 792, and 793. And that's another question, what precisely DO we make Historic?

In five years, someone who shows up in a WG saying that so-and-so doesn't work with NAT will be met with relieved smiles, and someone will say "that's history" ;)

Arnt
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]