-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 RJ Atkinson wrote: ... > BOTTOM LINE: > There seems to be clear consensus amongst folks outside > the IESG that (1) there is no current problem and (2) > no process change is warranted to make IESG notes mandatory > on non-IETF-track documents. +1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkquTaQACgkQE5f5cImnZrslVwCglTLLQLG+CyzUvJcTQclN93NC n8YAnj3TKxXsqEHjvsl0Ur2+OAa7uh1y =T1Qd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf