On Aug 17, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
Marshall Eubanks a écrit :
Emergencies. An emergency is defined as "there is a problem with the
TLP that is likely to be abused". In these cases, the trust can
publish
a modified text for a 2 week review period, then modify the TLP.
The
Trust must explain the reason for the change.
I have a hard time thinking of an emergency that can be fixed by a
timely change in the TLP which would likely require a lot of heavy
legal
advice and related work and coordination. Changes in policies may have
important impacts over time that would probably require enough time to
review. To me, the TLP should be a pretty stable document.
However, I might think of an emergency for a immediate legal action,
but
not sure about an emergency change in the TLP.
I guess I need to be educated on the use case for the emergency track.
My personal feeling is that we won't really know until we have had a
few, which hopefully will take
a very long time. But, it seems worthwhile to have some sort of "in
case of emergency, break glass"
procedure.
And, I agree, I hope that the TLP becomes a very stable document.
Regards
Marshall
Marc.
--
=========
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN news service: http://reeves.viagenie.ca
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf