Re: Retention of blue sheets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pekka,

E-mail address are useful data. Anyhow, I would not able to replay to
you without using your address ;-)

.... and how to know which "John Smith" is the real participant?

+1 for Brian Carpenter

Thanks,

Géza

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Pekka Savola<pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>
>> I agree with Alissa that having an explicit privacy policy would be a
>> good idea, but the fact of participation in an open standards process
>> certainly cannot be considered a private matter. Exactly the opposite,
>> in fact.
>
> Indeed, but why do the blue sheets ask for an email address?  I'm not
> interested in receiving any mail (e.g. product advertisements loosely
> related to the IETF protocols) based on my writing my email on the blue
> sheets.  I accept it's good for disambiguation though asking for affiliation
> might achieve the same.  If anyone would be able to get the blue sheets,
> they probably shouldn't get the email addresses. Having to write a privacy
> policy would require ironing out these small details which might be a goog
> thing.
>
> --
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]