Re: Retention of blue sheets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 04:25:11PM +0200, Pete Resnick wrote:
> On 7/30/09 at 3:03 PM +0100, Samuel Weiler wrote:
> 
> >What harms would come from destroying those old records and/or not 
> >collecting such details in the future?  And how widespread is the 
> >support for destroying them?
> 
> Repeating something I just mentioned to Sam in the hallway (and 
> IANAL, even though I teach some of this stuff to engineers):
> 
> There is some case law that says that if you participate (even 
> passively) in a standards body in which patent disclosure is 
> required, and you choose not to disclose your patents, you may lose 
> your rights to assert the patents. Having a blue sheet with someone's 
> name on it may be sufficient for a court to find that the person 
> can't assert. I think that makes the blue sheets worth keeping.
> 
> pr
> -- 
> Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
> Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


	you then have the burden of proof to show that you
	were not there, when I have signed you name to the blue
	sheet.

-- 
--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]