No, no angst over the term. I find the idea fetching, in principle, too, but I can't see how the proposed change does what is needed. If the goal is to be able to allow the trust to relicence the code as it sees fit, parallel with its ability to cope with the license of rfc text, then I get the purpose of the change. If this is just to avoid the bureaucracy of publishing a new rfc then no, sorry, I don't think that's a good idea. The bureaucratic hurdles are there to find consensus, and I see no reason to make this a special case. If we think rfc production is too bureaucratic, let's fix that. Andrew Sullivan |
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf