Will do, assuming my co-author agrees. On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > At 2:45 PM -0700 5/26/09, Lisa Dusseault wrote: >>Good suggestions. I do agree with explaining why a subset was tested >>and how that subset was chosen. In some cases, however, listing all >>known implementations would be onerous, ambiguous (an implementation >>that shipped (or went beta) with partial (or untested) possibly >>unannounced standards support) or even contrary to privacy agreements. > > Fully agree. That's why I listed them as suggestions, and I hope that this document does so as well. > > --Paul Hoffman, Director > --VPN Consortium > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf