On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:35:07AM -0700, Dave CROCKER wrote: > changes can be made to a specification by YAM. Specifically, when moving > a spec from Draft to Full, any changes MUST NOT be of the type that make > a a conforming implementation suddenly become non-conforming. Does this mean that if a Draft Standard really is ambiguous, and different implementations have different interpretations that turn out to be non-interoperable, YAM won't be allowed to pick one and say, "This is what it meant"? (I think this is what the original concern being raised was. Anyway, it seems like a less-than-ideal rule to me.) A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf