Re: Second Last Call: rfc3852 (Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)) to Draft Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The IESG wrote, On 2009-04-27 06:58 PDT:
> The IESG has received a request from the smime WG (smime) to consider 
> the following document:
> 
> - 'Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) '
>   RFC 3852 as a Draft Standard
> 
> No technical issues were raised during the first Last Call.  However, the
> Last Call failed to highlight two normative references to standards track
> documents of lower maturity:  RFCs 3280 and 3281.

lower maturity?

Did you perhaps mean "greater maturity" or "lower number" ?
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]