Re: [mif] WG Review: Multiple InterFaces (mif)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian,

I agree with what you said here, MIF should tackle this thoroughly.

I just wondering whether any ISP provider ICE service for open applications?
maybe my limited knowledge.

Regards,

-Hui

2009/4/24 Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Apr 23, 2009, Hui Deng wrote:
>
>> For what I know at the moment service provider deployment experience,
>> ICE like solution has been deployed by a dedicate close network, this
>> is not interact with MIF space we talked here, mif are resolve general
>> issue with host connections, in that scenario, application is isolated.
>
>
> Hui -
>
> If the to-be MIF working group is to tackle the issue of address selection,
> then doing so thoroughly would require to also look into NAT traversal, and
> this includes ICE.  ICE specifies address selection rules for a large group
> of applications.
>
> - Christian
>
>
>
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]