Hui Deng wrote:
Hi, Jari,
What I suggest is like the below:
Connections to Multiple Networks (mif)
------------------------------------------------
Personally, I think that this sort of disconnect between WG name and
acronym would create long-lived confusion about the name of the group.
While I don't favor changing the name at this point (because I don't
think we know what to change it to), if we do change the name we should
change the acronym, too, in my opinion.
Margaret
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf