On March 9, 2009 Alan DeKok wrote... > Security Section: > > There are good reasons to provision USM access so supplement with > AAA-based access, however. > > > NIT: This doesn't appear to be a sentence. Yeah. Let's see what that was supposed to say... I think it's: There are good reasons to provision USM access to supplement AAA-based access, however. ISMS decided to handle this late WG Last Call comment as IETF Last Call input, so I'm re-posting the message now. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf