On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Francis Dupont wrote:> => this was and is the rule but because of typewriters the rule was> suspended during the 20th century. Now typewriters are in museums> and current century is 21th. BTW accents can be necessary to avoid> some ambiguities (cf 2nd reference) so the rule (in this case :-) is> justified. Please, if people are going to open that debate again, could you (1)only do it if you've read all the relevant material in the idnabisarchives and (2) do it on the WG mailing list (idnabis), since that'swhere the relevant discussions are going on? I will not rehash the arguements about this here, but I urge peoplewho want to weigh in on this to think about the matching rules for "E"and "e" in the DNS, and then think about what might happen if we alsoneed to accommodate E->é _and_ É->é. Thank you. A -- Andrew Sullivanajs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Inc._______________________________________________Ietf mailing listIetf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf