Re: resignation business

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I assume that the relevant procedures were applied, etc. Is there any action that is warranted in other domains, or should this be left to brew in your particular teakettle?

On Apr 19, 2009, at 4:56 PM, SM wrote:

At 13:09 19-04-2009, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
It would be very much appreciated if someone could explain this
"resignation" business that recently spilled over into the IETF
discussion list.

Where did all of this start?

This started in the IDNAbis WG. The WG Chair sent a message to a participant warning him that his posting rights may be removed [1]. Another participant was also warned [2]. The WG Chair then removed posting privileges for that participant and another one [3].

Regards,
-sm

1. http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2009-April/004453.html
2. http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2009-April/004478.html
3. http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/idna-update/2009-April/004489.html
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]