That said, this particular document is well written, gets the point across, and does the job nicely.
Of course, we could hold up publication for another three months, just so it can be an even five years since Dave submitted -00 :-(((((
On Feb 26, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Eliot Lear wrote:
Lisa,I think this document is fairly well written, and I would support its publication.Eliot On 2/26/09 9:59 PM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: The IESG<iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:10 AM Subject: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard To: IETF-Announce<ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to considerthe following document: - 'Internet Mail Architecture ' <draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicitsfinal comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to theietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2009-03-26. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11811&rfc_flag=0 The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D: _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce _______________________________________________ Apps-Discuss mailing list Apps-Discuss@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss_______________________________________________ Apps-Discuss mailing list Apps-Discuss@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf