> Ray and Trustees, > Please note that this is exactly the sort of issue that I > believed we had a commitment to have sorted out and in the hands > of the tool maintainers by the 15th (or earlier). It doesn't > depend on the specific text to by used, so could, and IMO > should, have been worked through in parallel with, or in advance > of, any considerations of text. > While getting things working is more important in the short term > than understanding what happened here, I believe that the fact > that fairly explicit commitments were made and then the ball was > dropped is something that should be visible to the community and > that calls for a review of the IASA's way of doing business. +1 Ned _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf