Re: [Fwd: Last Call: draft-hoffman-dac-vbr (Vouch By Reference) to Proposed Standard]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 11:40 01-02-2009, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Based on the Discusses that have been lodged (including those resolved) concerns focus on:


     1.  Macroeconomic effect from email filtering:  Monopolistic pressures

There wasn't any comments on the Last-Call about the implications to individual or small companies, particularly ones in small emerging market countries. It's refreshing to see such a question being brought up during an IESG evaluation.

Does the IETF community believe that the following text (see IESG Evaluation) is appropriate:

 "If a recipient selects one or more vouch-for domains, and uses the
  results of vouching to adjust spam scores on incoming email, that
  recipient is placing a great deal of operational trust and power
  in the selected vouch-for service operators.  Recipients are strongly
  encouraged to select such services with care.  Further, recipients
  are strongly encouraged to select more than one vouch-for service to
  avoid a single-point-of-failure and to avoid placing excessive trust
  and power in a single vouch-for service operator."
What about senders from small emerging market countries having a very hard time getting any widely accepted assurance group to vouch for them?

Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]