Re: RFC 5378 "contributions"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 16:23 15-01-2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
That I think is the key; each person can only warrant what they
themselves have authored.  Something that might be worth looking at is
the Developer's Certification of Origin, which is how Linux Kernel
developers deal with contributions for the Linux Kernel.  Anything

First, we get authors to certify their works. Then we get contributors (see Note Well) to certify their contributions. If we take that one step further, the IETF will be able to establish formal membership.

which gets incoproated into the kernel must have a Signed-off-by, like
this:

The IETF does not use version control to keep track of changes to a document. Document changes cannot be compared to code contributions as the process is different. Historically, the process of getting from idea to RFC has been informal. "Official" communication is usually done through email. Those messages aren't even signed with S/MIME or PGP.

There was a time when it was easy to make a contribution to the IETF and when we could tap into the large pool of published knowledge and build upon it. In my opinion, copyright was relatively straight-forward if one was operating within the Standards Process. Now, I need to hire a lawyer before asserting anything.

Regards,
-sm

P.S. I share the blame because of the comments I posted to the IPR WG.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]