At 2:38 PM -0400 10/6/08, John C Klensin wrote: >(1) A mailing list for discussion is not designated. While I >would normally suggested rfc-interest, the document appears to >be written on the assumption that approval of this proposal >rests with the IETF (presumably via the IESG) and IAOC and not >with the RFC Editor (with presumed review by the IAB), so I am >sending to this list. An earlier thread had already moved the discussion to rfc-interest, and I think it is more productive to have this discussed in one place. There is already an active discussion going on over there. I will put a note to that effect in the -04 version. If the document moves to IETF Last Call, it will certainly get discussed here. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf