Hi, I support this experiment. Why short sessions? Why not longer sessions? In my experience, Friday sessions are invaluable for having "working" sessions rather than status sessions, and Friday sessions have been preferred in some WGs as a way to get real f2f time for engineering. David Harrington dbharrington@xxxxxxxxxxx ietfdbh@xxxxxxxxxxx dharrington@xxxxxxxxxx > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of IETF Chair > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:33 PM > To: IETF Announcement list > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx; iesg@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73 > > The IESG is considering an experiment for IETF 73 in Minneapolis, and > we would like community comments before we proceed. Face-to-face > meeting time is very precious, especially with about 120 IETF WGs > competing for meeting slots. Several WGs are not able to get as much > meeting time as they need to progress their work. As an experiment, > we are considering adding two Friday afternoon one-hour meeting slots. > The proposed Friday schedule would be: > > 0900-1130 Morning Session I > 1130-1300 Break > 1300-1400 Afternoon Session I > 1415-1515 Afternoon Session II > > Please share your thoughts about this proposed experiment. The > proposed experiment will be discussed on the IETF Didcussion mail > list (ietf@xxxxxxxx). > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf