Re: Progressing I-Ds Immediately Before Meetings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:42:08 -0700
Dave Crocker <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> 
> Russ Housley wrote:
> > When all of the Internet-Drafts were processed by Secretariat
> > staff, there was a huge workload concern.  
> ,,,
> > I also agree that an AD should be able to get an I-D posted after
> > the cut-off date if it is "the right thing."  
> 
> 
> Russ,
> 
> I'm missing some bit of logic that I hope you can clarify:
> 
>     1. The cut-off was put into place due to workload on the 
> Secretariat.  The automated I-D has eliminated that bottleneck
> problem.
> 
No, that's not the primary reason -- the reason was to give wg members a
chance to actually read the documents before the meeting.  Only a small
part of the interval was for the benefit of the secretariat.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]