Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:32:32 -0400
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>, Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx>, Ted Faber <faber@xxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4873AE46.6010906@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421)

RFC1043 defines the dot. The fact that some apps don't recognize it is a

bug.


not when the application explicitly specifies that FQDNs are to be used.
in such cases the dot is superfluous.

Keith
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Joe Touch

References:
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Ted Faber
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Mark Andrews
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Ted Faber
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
  - From: Joe Touch

Prev by Date: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Next by Date: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Previous by thread: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Next by thread: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]