At Mon, 26 May 2008 10:17:19 +0300, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote: > > Hi Ekr, > > ~snip~ > > >> > > >> When you operate a network and you want this stuff to work then you > >> have to consider this aspect. > >> In the past a few folks have suggested to write a BCP about how > >> different deployments may deal with this aspect but I believe it is > >> far too early todo so for a BCP. > > > >The problem is that I'm not sure that this is an issue that > >can be solved by the network operator. In the example I > >described, it sounds to me like new protocol work may be required. > > So far, there was nobody who believed that new protocol work would be > required. Then I think this document needs some editorial work to explain this, since as it is, it certainly gave me that impression. > >http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-geopriv-deref-proto > >col-00.txt > > > >What's the status of that document? > > > > At the last meeting the group agreed that this document should become a > WG item. > I believe my co-author has submitted the document but it got stuck > somewhere. > > Thanks for reminding me to ping my co-authors again. As noted above, based on my understanding of what you have said, this needs to be a normative ref. -Ekr _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf