David - Many thanks for the review. - Sally http://www.icir.org/floyd/ > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd > or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-dccp-rfc3448bis-06.txt > Reviewer: David L. Black > Review Date: 19 May 2008 > IESG Telechat date: 22 May 2008 > > Summary: > This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC. > > This is a well-written detailed draft updating an existing > RFC on rate-based congestion control. It has clearly had a > high level of review by congestion control experts. > > I have only done a generalist review, and in particular have > not checked the equations and pseudo-code in detail. I trust > that the authors and reviewers in the DCCP WG to have done > this level of review, as indicated by the change history. > > idnits 2.08.10 found 1 line that was 1 character too long > and pointed out that a -04 version of the rfc2581bis draft > exists. Neither of these need attention, as the RFC Editor > will handle them in the normal course of editing activity. _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf