Re: Random Network Endpoint Technology (RNET)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Excerpts from Melinda Shore at 17:55:57 -0400 on Wed 21 May 2008:
> On 5/21/08 5:49 PM, "eburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <eburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > So we have reinvented STUN?
> 
> This is probably closer to Paul Francis's NUTSS stuff without
> the cool crankback and especially without resolving the location
> problem.

With NUTSS the destination is (probably) seen in routing from the
start, but signaling is required to set up a desirable path.  Here the
problem is that neither source nor destination is globally routed.

I'm concerned about scaling.  That's a lot of dynamic state in the
core routers, precisely where we don't want it.  He's probably better
off source-routing.  See NIMROD
<http://ana-3.lcs.mit.edu/~jnc/nimrod/docs.html> and remember what it
stands for! :-)

He should also see the proposals in the Routing Research Group
<http://www3.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/RoutingResearchGroup>

swb
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]