Hi all, On Tuesday 22 April 2008 23.14.03 Andy Bierman wrote: > IMO, there is strong community consensus for the charter as it > is currently written. There are several technical approaches, > such as 'continue to write data models in XSD' which are > technically viable, but have no community consensus at all. > > I don't think a formal WG process is needed to determine that > the strongest consensus exists for the approach currently outlined > in the charter. The 15 people on the design team represented > a wide cross section of those actually interested in this work. > I am among the 10 - 15 people who were not involved in the design team, > but agree with the charter. That seems like a lot of consensus > for this technical approach. Absolutely. Well said. David _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf