Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis: closing the implicit MX issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Keith Moore wrote:
> Dave Crocker wrote:
> 
>> Yeah, this "running code" thing is over-rated.
> 
> indeed it is.  many people are so accustomed to accepting the problems 
> with today's large-scale email operation that they fail to see how 
> things could be any other way.  after all, it "works"...sort of.

+1

>> It also presumes that those implementing code operate wholly 
>> independently of those who will operate or use that running code.
> 
> no.  it only presumes that when the standard says one thing and the 
> needs of operators say something else, that the implementor is placed in 
> an awkward position.

+1000

Thank you for seeing this Keith.

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]