Re: Proposed IESG Statement Regarding RFC Errata for IETF Sream RFCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>One of the guidelines says:
>
> >   8.  Changes that modify the working of a process, such as changing
> >       an IANA registration procedure, to something that might be
> >       different from the intended consensus when the document was
> >       approved should be Archived.
>
>I do not understand an errata that suggests changing the defined
>process should be Archived.  Shouldn't this be flat out Rejected?

The intent was for the proposed change (submitted as an errata) to be 
considered if the document ever gets revised.

Russ

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]