Re: Proposed IESG Statement Regarding RFC Errata for IETF Sream RFCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:

>I support adoption of these proposed guidelines, but have a couple of minor 
>comments...
>  
>
>>   After an erratum is reported, a report will be sent to the authors and
>>
>>   Area Directors (ADs) of the WG in which it originated.  If the WG has
>>   closed or the document was not associated with a WG, then the
>>   report will be sent to the ADs for the Area most closely associated
>>   to the subject matter.
>>    
>>
>If the document was produced by a WG that is not closed, the report should 
>be copied to the WG chairs as well.
>  
>
+1.


_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]