On 2008-04-15 09:11, Ned Freed wrote: >> +1 to Henrik's comments. I don't think the two MUSTs >> that he comments on are algorithmically possible. > > These two MUSTs (the ability to whitelist specific posters without them having > to receive list mail and spam rejection) are both completely trivial to > implement with our software. The latter is normally done (and definitely should > be done) at the SMTP level, minimizing blowback. > > I spend essentially no time these days with other messaging software but I'm > having a great deal of trouble believing this would be in any way difficult to > implement with something else. This is all stuff that lots of lists have done > for years - it doesn't even come close to rocket science. I think we're reading the words differently. That suggests to me that they are ambiguous. Brian _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf