-1. I think that given the pressure of work on our volunteer "officials", we should allow load sharing wherever it's feasible. We have running code here - despite having the IAD's support and a volunteer Secretary for the Trust, two successive IAOC chairs have been overburdened. Brian On 2008-04-04 22:50, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > After considering the comments so far, I think I disagree with having a > separate Trust chair. > > The idea behind making the IAOC be the Trustees was, among other things, > to make sure that we didn't create yet another nexus of control in the > labyrinth of committees; I understood the legal existence of the > Trustees as something different (in name) from the IAOC to be strictly > something we did for legal purposes > > If the IAOC chair is overburdened by having to manage the IAOC in two > different contexts, get him (or her) a secretary. > > I agree with John's comment that leaving the current trustees in charge > on dissolution of the IAOC is inappropriate; for one thing, that also > removes all the recall mechanisms. > Figure out something else to do in this case. > > Harald > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > IETF@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf