Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> 
> I think he means if the sheet is truly used for proof of presence and IPR awareness then it's not good enough to allow name collisions.  
> But I don't see how blue sheets would hold any strength anyway for that purpose, because 
> 1) signing doesn't mean I was there the whole time, and (2) doesn't mean I had stopped reading emails and was paying attention.  

And in addition, somebody could be in the room AND be aware of IPR and 
NOT SIGN the blue sheet. There is nothing saying that people in the room 
have to sign a blue sheet. I, for one, have seen people pass around blue 
sheets without signing.

Cheers
Suresh

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]