On Apr 3, 2008, at 8:10 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote: > > Ole guessed >> My understanding is that the blue sheet serves mainly as a record of >> "who was in the room" which I think is largely used to plan room >> capacities for the next meeting. > > the "blue sheets" are required as part of the basic openness > process in a standards organization - there is a need to know > "who is in the room" (see RFC 2418 section 3.1 for the actual > requirement) > > the blue sheets become part of the formal record of the standards > process and can be retrieved if needed (e.g. in a lawsuit) but are not > generally made available > > as pointed out by Mark Andrews - email addresses can be useful in > determining the actual identity of the person who scrawled their > name on the sheet - so it is an advantage to retain them > > I'm trying to understand how the blue sheets contribute in any > significant way to the spam problem - someone whould have to be > surreptitiously copying them or quickly writing down the email > addresses - both could happen but do not seem to be all that > likely there are far more efficient ways to grab email addresses > > so, my question is "is this a problem that needs solving"? > I would say not. If people want to harvest our email addresses, they are readily available from IETF mail archives, which have the advantage of actually being machine readable. I do not see that any change is required in the blue sheets. Regards Marshall > Scott > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > IETF@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf