> >The IESG has received a request from the IP Telephony WG (iptel) to >consider the following document: > >- 'The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource > Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry ' > <draft-ietf-iptel-tel-reg-05.txt> as a Proposed Standard > >The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2008-04-15. Exceptionally, >comments may be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please >retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > >The file can be obtained via >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-iptel-tel-reg-05.txt > > >IESG discussion can be tracked via >https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=14101&rfc_flag=0 > I support this draft going forward. I believe, in particular, that the choice of "Specification Required, Designated Expert" is the best match here. I had a set of conversations with Jon and the authors on this over the course of the last couple of iterations, and I believe the result will help prevent unregistered parameters in "closed" environments, give sufficient review to encourage well thought-out extensions, and generally support interoperability in this space. Like everything, it does represent some compromises, but I believe they are the right ones for this URI parameter registry. regards, Ted Hardie _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf