Re: RFC 5241 on Naming Rights in IETF Protocols

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Just publish an RFC that contains the names of popular celebrities,  
and use Google ads. The IETF site should do well in link-rankings...

A number of non-IETF sites already make money off RFCs courtesy of  
Google ads.

On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:

> Can this be extended to WG naming rights as well. :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-announce-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@xxxxxxxx 
> ]
> On Behalf Of rfc-editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:58 PM
> To: ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx; rfc-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: rfc-editor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RFC 5241 on Naming Rights in IETF Protocols
>
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
>        RFC 5241
>
>        Title:      Naming Rights in IETF Protocols
>        Author:     A. Falk, S. Bradner
>        Status:     Informational
>        Date:       1 April 2008
>        Mailbox:    falk@xxxxxxx,
>                    sob@xxxxxxxxxxx
>        Pages:      12
>        Characters: 25304
>        Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:   None
>
>        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5241.txt
>
> This document proposes a new revenue source for the IETF to support
> standardization activities: protocol field naming rights, i.e., the
> association of commercial brands with protocol fields.  This memo
> describes a process for assignment of rights and explores some of the
> issues associated with the process.  Individuals or organizations that
> wish to purchase naming rights for one or more protocol fields are
> expected to follow this process.  This memo provides information for  
> the
> Internet community.
>
>
> INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet  
> community.
> It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
> this memo is unlimited.
>
> This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list.
> Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list
> should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxx  Requests to be
> added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should
> be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending
> an EMAIL message to rfc-info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx with the message body
>
> help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example:
>
>        To: rfc-info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>        Subject: getting rfcs
>
>        help: ways_to_get_rfcs
>
> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
> author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   
> Unless
> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
> unlimited distribution.
>
> Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to
> RFC-EDITOR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to  
> RFC
> Authors, for further information.
>
>
> The RFC Editor Team
> USC/Information Sciences Institute
>
> ...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF mailing list
> IETF@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]