--On Friday, 28 March, 2008 11:38 +1100 Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> OTOH, I think standardizing this convention makes all sorts >> of sense, but not, of course, in 2821bis. > > Why not in 2821bis? Is 2821bis really that time critical? It is on its way to Draft Standard. This would be a sufficiently new feature to force recycle at Proposed, which, to put it mildly, would not be welcomed by the editor or, more important, those who convinced me to do the work. john _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf