jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Noel Chiappa) writes: > > From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > If someone participates under a pseudonym with the objective of > > inserting patented technology and anyone finds out they are in big > > trouble. Much worse than any prior case. > > We should write in our rules that anyone who contributes technology to any > IETF activity which they know to be either a) patented, b) the subject of a > filing, or c) the subject of a planned future filing, *without disclosing said > patent status* to the WG/I*, either: Could we get away with making the NOTE WELL more visible? For example, require that everyone (including any pseudonymous contributors) who submit an internet-draft needs to ACK that they have read and understood the NOTE WELL? /Simon _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf